Search for: "California Public Utilities Commission v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission" Results 21 - 40 of 89
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
SIGNIFICANT LEGAL AND REGULATORY DEVELOPMENTS IN 2022 SEC’s proposed climate-related disclosure rules:  On March 21, 2022, the Securities and Exchange Commission proposed expansive climate-related disclosure requirements in a proposing release that, if adopted, would require U.S. public companies and foreign private issuers to dramatically expand the breadth, specificity and rigor of climate-related disclosures in their SEC periodic reports and registration… [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A Right-Wing Think Tank Claimed to Be a Church. [read post]
Second, we present evidence on public-company disclosures consistent with issuers’ understanding that the SEC has long had authority to take regulatory action in this area. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Richard Zelichov and Trevor T. Garmey
In this article, we begin with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) regulations that mandate risk disclosures, and the federal statutes that create civil liability for misleading statements. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 1:34 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 1:37 pm by Kristyn Melvin and Matt Bonovich
As current supply chain issues continue to threaten the U.S. photovoltaic solar industry, solar module suppliers, manufacturers, renewable energy developers and utilities alike face great uncertainty surrounding the immediate future of the solar module supply market. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
California – Why San Jose Mayor Sam Liccardo Is Being Sued Over Private Emails San Jose Mercury News – Maggie Angst | Published: 2/8/2022 Five years after California Supreme Court’s ruling that texts and emails sent by public officials on their personal devices or accounts containing public business should be [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Given the high levels of public interest, regulatory scrutiny and investor activity, directors and officers who fail to properly consider, act on and disclose climate risks are facing increasing exposures. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 9:03 pm by Henry Miller
California Attorney General Rob Bonta called the decision “a victory for public safety in California,” and noted that the decision still allows “law-abiding gun owners to exercise their constitutional rights. [read post]
  (2) Does the Federal Power Act preempt state court challenges to an environmental impact report prepared under the California Environmental Quality Act in order to comply with the federal water quality certification under the federal Clean Water Act? [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
With free legal aid from National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Geary filed a federal complaint arguing the union infringed on her constitutionally protected rights under the foundation-won CWA v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:25 pm by rainey Reitman
Previously, she was counselor to the chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, and she co-founded and led the nonprofit Public Knowledge for 12 years. [read post]
(2) Does the Federal Power Act preempt state court challenges to an environmental impact report prepared under the California Environmental Quality Act in order to comply with the federal water quality certification under the federal Clean Water Act? [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 10:59 am by William Rappolt and Paul Kaufman
In a recent opinion, the Ninth Circuit held that the California Public Utilities Commission’s (CPUC) Renewable Market Adjusting Tariff (Re-MAT) program and alternative Qualifying Facility (QF) standard offer contract (Standard Contract) were preempted by federal law. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 3:49 pm by Seth Hilton
Peterman et al., ruling that California’s feed-in tariff for small qualifying facilities (QFs), the Renewable Market Adjusting Tariff (ReMAT), violates the federal Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA) (Ninth Circuit Case No. 17-17531). [read post]