Search for: "California Public Utilities Commission v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission"
Results 61 - 80
of 93
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
The federal agency says workers from Ketchikan Public Utilities in August 2007 removed about five gallons of oil containing PCBs from a transformer and improperly incinerated the liquid. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm
Vol. 2, No. 20, July 19, 2010 The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 11:55 am
During that same time, by contrast, the 114th Congress enacted just 329 public laws filling about 3,000 pages in the Statutes at Large. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm
We base our analysis on our experience as Commissioners of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), an independent agency charged by Congress with promoting a vibrant and diverse media ecosystem consistent with the First Amendment. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
Click Here Anchorage Waste Water Utility and Contractor Pay $9850 EPA Storm Water Penalty. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 1:34 pm
Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
Click Here DECISIONS Arkema, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 7:06 am
He advises clients on a variety of Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and state regulatory proceedings related to the new markets and the contractual arrangements that have emerged to support the electricity industry. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
Click Here Celanese plant pollution violation against energy provider settled for $310,000. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
Thus, the agency’s determination that there was continuing utility to the 2006 decision and related environmental analysis was proper. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
Thus, the agency’s determination that there was continuing utility to the 2006 decision and related environmental analysis was proper. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
(2) Does the Federal Power Act preempt state court challenges to an environmental impact report prepared under the California Environmental Quality Act in order to comply with the federal water quality certification under the federal Clean Water Act? [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
(2) Does the Federal Power Act preempt state court challenges to an environmental impact report prepared under the California Environmental Quality Act in order to comply with the federal water quality certification under the federal Clean Water Act? [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 1:36 am
Go-Shop Provision Emerges as Alternative to Auctions
Fulton County Daily Report
In a first for the public utilities industry, Troutman Sanders client Semco Energy is using a go-shop provision as part of a multimillion-dollar deal. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
CASES PENDING AT THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT There are 2 CEQA cases pending at the California Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm
Given the high levels of public interest, regulatory scrutiny and investor activity, directors and officers who fail to properly consider, act on and disclose climate risks are facing increasing exposures. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
Caltrans further relied on the position that the project’s impacts were analyzed consistent with the California Coastal Commission’s certified regulatory program. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
Caltrans further relied on the position that the project’s impacts were analyzed consistent with the California Coastal Commission’s certified regulatory program. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 4:42 pm
— Imelda V. [read post]
