Search for: "California v. American Stores"
Results 41 - 60
of 803
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2016, 2:48 pm
The owners complied with the many federal and California regulations pertaining to firearms stores. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 2:18 pm
In California v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 3:50 pm
In American Civil Rights Foundation v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 3:07 pm
The Court’s opinion is Riley v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Second Amendment may invalidate ban on opening new gun stores in a California county
16 May 2016, 9:18 am
Though D.C. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 10:47 am
Chris Hoofnagle, they chose opt-out to avoid the IMS v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 4:15 pm
Connecticut and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 2:59 am
Progressive sentiment vs. actual progress: Philadelphia bans cashless stores [Jeffrey Miron; related, Billy Binion, Reason (council member thinks city should legislate against “elitism”), Joe Setyon, Reason (NYC)] Meanwhile, heading in the opposite direction: “California bill would require businesses to offer e-receipts” [Don Thompson, Associated Press] “Overhaul CRA? [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 4:00 pm
(See, e.g., Best Buy Stores, L.P. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 9:27 pm
Several Northern District of California Judges recently ruled in discrimination cases: This blog previously covered Zhang v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 3:40 pm
Bloomberg (Dec. 6, 2010) American Bar Association (ABA): Supreme Court briefs, Wal-Mart v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 9:30 am
The letters from the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), the American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California (ACLU NorCal), and the American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California (ACLU SoCal) gave the agencies a deadline of June 15 to comply and respond. [read post]
12 May 2022, 7:17 am
Cal.) in Weiss v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:05 am
I was planning to build an online store. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:05 am
I was planning to build an online store. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 4:30 am
Butterworth v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
This includes plaintiffs’ right to advertise their products on-site — an especially useful form of advertising for sellers and consumers alike.[3] Yet California Penal Code § 26820 (“Section 26820”) prevents a firearms dealer from displaying any “handgun or imitation handgun, or [a] placard advertising the sale or other transfer thereof” anywhere that can be seen outside the four corners of its store. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 1:06 pm
Winn-Dixie Stores and Robles v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 10:27 am
The case is Gil v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 5:04 pm
In the intervening years, class action jurisprudence seemed to take a step away from this thinking, spurred by the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
