Search for: "California v. Arizona" Results 181 - 200 of 2,007
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2023, 6:59 pm by Jonathan Zasloff
The Supreme Court’s 1963 decision in Arizona v California gave the Secretary the right to reduce different states’ allotments to river water based upon drought conditions. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:41 am by INFORRM
On 1 March 2023, judgment was handed down in Bukhari v Bukhari [2023] EWHC 427 (KB) by Steyn J. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Arizona – Arizona Governor Seeks Ethics Review of Former Attorney General MSN – Yvonne Wingett Sanchez and Isaac Stanley-Becker (Washington Post) | Published: 2/25/2023 Arizona Gov. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 3:30 am by Kevin Kaufman
Top marginal rates range from Arizona’s 2.5 percent to California’s 13.3 percent. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am by admin
Putting aside the idiosyncratic chapter by the late Professor Berger, most of the third edition of the Reference Manual presented guidance on many important issues. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 5:53 am by Ezra Rosser
And in this case, favoring non-Indian water users (Los Angeles (really California in general), Las Vegas, Phoenix, etc) over reservation needs. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm by Alexandra Walsh
For example, in the seminal case Goss v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 2:09 pm by David Post
All sides agree that California may not actually compel pork producers in Iowa or Arizona—in the sense of imposing a legal obligation on them enforceable by means of a fine or other punishment—to adopt California's pig-breeding standards, just as it may not compel businesses in Iowa or Arizona to abide by California's minimum wage rules, or California's business licensure rules, or California's public… [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm by Jim Sedor
” From the States and Municipalities Arizona – Voter Fraud Unit in Arizona Will [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:48 am by Peter Mahler
As of about five years ago, when Professor Douglas Moll published his nationwide survey of LLC dissolution statutes, five states — Arizona, California, Florida, Kansas, and New Hampshire — expressly include deadlock in their involuntary dissolution statutes as ground for judicial dissolution, separate and apart from the predominant statutory standard, i.e., it is no longer reasonably practicable for the LLC to carry on its business. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 1:00 pm by Orin S. Kerr
  Then we cover searches of a car incident to arrest, with Arizona v. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 5:57 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Reuben Clark Law School The Reports of My Death Are Greatly Exaggerated: The Continued Vitality of Worcester v. [read post]