Search for: "California v. Arizona"
Results 141 - 160
of 2,109
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2011, 7:58 pm
I read interesting post on the Law Blawg: California Attorneys Fees, entitled, Special Fee Shifting: Qui Tam Claimant Whacked With $300,000 Fee Award Under Arizona Fee Shifting Statute Did Not Obtain Reversal. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 5:06 am
Arizona v. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
”Raven should be considered alongside the 2009 ruling (almost two decades later) in Strauss v. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 10:20 am
This means that if an owner receives a discharge in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy case filed in Washington, Oregon, Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, or Nevada, that owner will no longer be personally obligated to pay any post-petition assessments. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 8:51 am
But during my adult life, I have lived in Arizona, California, Illinois, and Virginia. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 2:51 pm
Lynd v. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 11:13 am
The LA Law Library celebrates Law Week (and the 50th anniversary of Miranda v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 5:00 am
Ct. 2567 (2011), on whether any such presumption existed at all, with Justice Kennedy not voting on the issue; and (2) that in a concurring opinion in Arizona v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 6:51 am
Howe's penultimate sentence:[S]upporters of the commission warn the Court that, if voters aren’t allowed to hand responsibility for redistricting over to independent commissions like the ones in Arizona and California, there will be no real way to combat political gerrymandering, which results in “partisanship and dysfunction” in Congress. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court last week heard oral arguments in an important case involving federalism and election regulation, Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 8:44 am
See Asvesta v. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 9:18 pm
In Scheehle v. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 6:00 am
Taylor v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 9:41 am
This test was formulated by the California Supreme Court in Comedy III Productions, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 12:58 am
Hodge v. [read post]
8 May 2011, 12:51 am
District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
7 May 2017, 6:00 am
LEXIS 68293 (D AZ, May 3, 2017), an Arizona federal district court dismissed a Wiccan inmate's complaint that his religious practices were not accommodated.In Wolcott v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 8:18 am
Coverage of the opinion in Arizona v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 1:32 pm
Intervenor-Appellees in the case are the seven Colorado River Basin States of Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming; the Colorado River Commission of Nevada; the Southern Nevada Water Authority; the Colorado River Energy Distributors Association; the Central Arizona Water Conservation District; the Imperial Irrigation District; and the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (collectively, Intervenors). [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:21 pm
You see a fair number of Ninth Circuit cases certifying questions to the California Supreme Court, the Arizona and Nevada Supreme Courts, etc. [read post]
