Search for: "California v. Booth"
Results 1 - 20
of 136
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2011, 6:00 am
The case was Bigbee v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 6:00 am
But Garcia v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 11:00 am
Gay Law Students Assn. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 1:42 pm
One such question came in California v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 11:46 am
In Zuniga v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 6:24 pm
In Coleman v. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 9:49 am
Some say it could be the biggest ruling since Roe v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 5:19 am
From McKenna v. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 1:24 pm
In a Findlaw column on Lopez Torres, Marci Hamilton revisits California Democratic Party v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 10:00 am
Thing v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 11:44 am
The Supreme Court recently upheld a ruling ordering the state of California to release approximately 40,000 prison inmates because of the immense overcrowding that lead to poor health conditions amounting to cruel and unusual punishment in Brown v. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 3:30 am
Separately, Michael Booth at New Jersey Law Journal reports here about this Assembly Bill, which would codify this NJ Supreme Court decision and provide for a two-year statute of limitations in discrimination cases under NJ’s Law Against Discrimination, while prohibiting certain waiver provisions in employment contracts. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 3:30 am
Separately, Michael Booth at New Jersey Law Journal reports here about this Assembly Bill, which would codify this NJ Supreme Court decision and provide for a two-year statute of limitations in discrimination cases under NJ’s Law Against Discrimination, while prohibiting certain waiver provisions in employment contracts. [read post]
24 May 2011, 3:13 am
The Supreme Court, in Brown v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 8:00 am
Let's review how tort legal duty works under California law: In Bigbee v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 2:54 pm
The Court issued its opinion in Horne v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
United States); or even in one’s enclosed but not fully covered “curtilage” when viewed from an airplane (California v. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 3:01 am
The issue was whether the ordinance's restriction on operating hours was valid under the California Constitution, and its requirement that the doors to peep show booths remain open was valid under the First Amendment. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 12:02 pm
The issue was whether the ordinance's restriction on operating hours was valid under the California Constitution, and its requirement that the doors to peep show booths remain open was valid under the First Amendment. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 10:41 am
I certainly hope the Court is not even considering going down the disastrous road of Booth v. [read post]