Search for: "California v. Cardenas"
Results 1 - 18
of 18
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2016, 6:00 am
In Cardenas v. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 6:00 am
In Cardenas v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 2:00 pm
See Kocsis v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 10:34 am
The Los Angeles Daily Journal this week reported a $1 Million jury verdict out of Kern County CA involving an traffic collision between tractor trailer and a passenger automobile (Cardenas v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 1:53 pm
Cardenas (1987) 192 Cal.App.3d 51, 58; see generally People v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 10:31 am
See eg., Ortega v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 8:21 am
Jan. 15, 2014) (actual falsehood may be pleaded by “alleging studies showing that a defendant's statement is false”); Cardenas v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 12:43 pm
Launey, Enedina Cardenas and Kerry McCoy FriedrichsOctober 11, 2015, was Governor Brown’s last day to sign bills the California Legislature presented to him following the first year of the 2015-2016 Legislative Session. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 8:58 am
Launey, Enedina Cardenas and Kerry McCoy Friedrichs The California Legislature adjourned Friday evening, September 11, to close its 2015-16 Legislative Session. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 1:09 pm
Synanon Foundation, Inc. (1979) 88 Cal.App.3d 342 and Cardenas v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:58 am
The Cardenas amendment to the Perata Mortgage Relief Act also inserted the word “initial” in front of the word contact for a reason. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 7:36 am
According to the complaint, she discovered in 2005 while attempting to fly from California to Malaysia that she was on a no-fly list. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 7:50 pm
Cardenas-Cardenas, No. 08-40210 Sentence for being an alien unlawfully present in the U.S. after deportation is affirmed where defendant's prior burglary conviction was a crime of violence for sentence-enhancement purposes. ... [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 10:51 am
This especially has been the case under California wage-hour law. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Ramos-Cardenas, No. 06-51383 Defendants' convictions for possession of marijuana with intent to distribute and conspiracy to possess marijuana with intent to distribute are affirmed over claims of error regarding: 1) the sufficiency of the evidence; 2) whether some defendants' Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause rights were violated by admission of the post-arrest statements given by two codefendants, even though a limiting instruction was given to the jury; and 3) whether the… [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 11:01 am
US v. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 4:21 pm
On March 25, in the case of one of these five (Medellin v. [read post]
