Search for: "California v. Harris"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,484
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
As the Court put it four years ago in Fisher v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 10:27 am
Two days ago, in Hayes v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 1:21 pm
In light of the US Supreme Court’s decision this week not to grant review in Iskanian v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 1:52 pm
Supreme Court ruling in Caperton v. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 11:51 am
In Harris v. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 2:48 pm
IMDb.com v. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 10:59 am
Posted by Jennifer BarreraOn November 28, 2007, the Supreme Court granted review of Harris v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 4:45 am
The taxman prevailed in ETC Marketing v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 5:40 am
Harris. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 1:08 pm
California Attorney General Kamala Harris filed a lawsuit against both companies under California law, citing the state’s stricter restrictions against anticompetitive behavior. eBay, Intuit Signed Noncompetitive Agreement, Government Alleges, The Huffington Post (11/16/12) Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 3:30 am
The Court referenced the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Harris v. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 7:50 am
Supreme Court’s opinion in Bearden v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm
Here, Grutter v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 11:05 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California on civil rights cases. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 9:56 am
Harris, No. 14-15978 (9th Cir. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 10:39 am
By now I’m sure you’ve heard that California Attorney General Kamala Harris is prosecuting three Backpage executives for pimping/conspiracy to pimp. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 4:03 pm
See Kilgore v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 12:28 pm
Under a 2013 Supreme Court decision, Harris v. [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 4:25 am
The court said that it found no evidence demonstrating that plaintiff's practice of his religion was substantially burdened by the refusal.In Harris v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in 2012 in Arizona v. [read post]