Search for: "California v. Harris" Results 121 - 140 of 1,565
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2013, 5:31 pm
Those specifically listing appellate expertise are Paul Cane (of Paul Hastings and counsel on the defense side in Harris v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
 The complaint (full text) in A Woman's Friend Pregnancy Resource Center v. [read post]
29 Dec 2018, 1:22 am by divi
Oil Facility Emergency Responder Exception for Employee Breaks The California Supreme Court in its 2016 decision Augustus v ABM Security Services held that the plaintiffs (security guards) need to be completely relieved of work obligations during their statutorily mandated rest breaks. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 12:57 pm
AGGREGATORS MAY FREELY REPRODUCE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RECORDS - On February 5th, 2009, the California Court of Appeals for the Sixth Appellate District released its decision in California first Amendment Coalition v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 7:12 am by Joy Waltemath
The California AG’s brief urges the High Court to grant the federal government’s petition for certiorari in Sebelius v. [read post]
1 Jan 2016, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Harris, (9th Cir., Dec. 29, 2015), the 9th Circuit also rejected an "as-applied" challenge to the California law. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 5:04 am by Jean O'Grady
The new modules cover Los Angeles County California (615,000 cases) and Harris District and County court in Texas (combined 255,000 cases). [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 7:18 pm by Maureen Johnston
Harris 13-1313 Issue: Whether the Commerce Clause allows California to impose a complete ban on the sale of wholesome, USDA-approved poultry products from other States and countries – in this case, foie gras – based solely on the agricultural methods used by out-of-state farmers who raise their animals entirely beyond California’s borders. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Harris, (CD CA, July 8, 2016), a California federal district court denied a preliminary injunction against enforcement of California's Reproductive FACT Act. [read post]