Search for: "California v. Hodari D."
Results 21 - 40
of 46
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2020, 6:00 am
In California v. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 9:03 pm
Hodari D. (1991) .... [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 8:26 am
Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621, 111 S. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 6:27 am
Hodari D, 499 U.S. 621 (1991). [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 1:28 pm
Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621, 628 (1991), the encounter is consensual and no reasonable suspicion is required. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 8:58 am
Hodari D., 499 U. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 9:33 pm
Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621, 628 (1991)). [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 1:53 pm
California, 395 U.S. 752 (1969). [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 1:54 pm
Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621 (1991). [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 12:08 pm
Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan endorsed this approach, noting that, in the 1991 decision California v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:07 pm
SANTA ROSA, CA — This is my upcoming article in the Empire Law Review (sans footnotes) Brendlin v California: Expansion of Fourth Amendment Standing or the End of a Legal Fiction? [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 4:30 am
Hodari D. (1991), holding that a chase is not a Fourth Amendment “seizure,” with 16, Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 8:22 am
In Hodari D. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 12:46 pm
Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621, 626 (1991) compelled a finding that no seizure had occurred. [read post]
9 Sep 2006, 7:53 am
Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621, 629 (1991), as providing "strong impli[cation]" for this rule). [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 1:31 am
Torres resolves uncertainty from dicta in a prior case, California v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm
A second is California v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 3:40 am
See California v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 5:52 pm
Hodari D, 499 U.S. 621 (1991). [read post]
25 Aug 2007, 9:00 am
See California v. [read post]
