Search for: "California v. Jones" Results 1 - 20 of 1,072
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2020, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
The Value of Deviance: Understanding Contextual Privacy, Loyola University Chicago Law Journal, Vol. 51, No. 65, 2019, Timothy Casey, California Western School of Law. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
IPSO IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 06584-20 Fair Play for Women v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved- IPSO mediation 02638-20 A woman v Mail Online, 3 Harassment (2019), 2 Privacy (2019), 1 Accuracy (2019), 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2019), 6 Children (2019), 12 Discrimination (2019), 14 Confidential sources (2019), Resolved0 IPSO mediation 01321-20 A Man v Sunday Life, 11 Victims of sexual assault… [read post]
24 May 2020, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
The issue of readers flouting copyright was highlighted last month when Guardian columnist Owen Jones used his Twitter feed to publish almost an entire Sunday Times investigation into the UK government’s handling of the Covid-19 crisis. [read post]
19 May 2020, 3:48 pm
Jones (2019) 36 Cal.App.5th 1028, 1031-1034 (Jones), which held that a Dueñas challenge to a pre-Dueñas minimum restitution fine is not forfeited by failure to raise it in the trial court. [read post]
17 May 2020, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
New Zealand’s Zombie Defamation Survival Guide: Solving the Grave State of Defamation Law with a Single Publication Rule, Victoria University of Wellington Legal Research Paper No. 22/2020, Hannah Jones, Victoria University of Wellington, Faculty of Law, Student/Alumni. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 3:32 pm by fvanloon
We received the records in our January 2018 FOIA lawsuit filed after the DOJ failed to respond to a December 2017 request for all communications between Strzok and Page (Judicial Watch v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 4:39 am by Saloni Khanderia
In this case, an article was written and edited in Florida, the article concerned a resident in California and relied on sources in California, and thus, the Court held that the intentional tortious act was “expressly aimed at California”. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 3:30 pm by fvanloon
The filings come in the appeals court’s proceedings concerning our lawsuit seeking records concerning “talking points or updates on the Benghazi attack” (Judicial Watch v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 8:11 am by fvanloon
Jones of Bell, Davis & Pitt in Charlotte, North Carolina; and by H. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 1:33 pm by fvanloon
” The new documents are the latest production from a January 2018 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed after the DOJ failed to respond to a December 2017 request for all communications between Strzok and Page (Judicial Watch v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 4:26 pm
  After all, the money flows the way it does regardless.That said, try as I might -- and I've tried hard -- I can't exactly tell what Justice Jones is trying to say in this opinion.If her point is that the trial court awarded $1.4 million in fees and costs to California and that wasn't an abuse of discretion given these facts, yep, right on. [read post]