Search for: "California v. Koenig" Results 1 - 20 of 23
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2021, 6:18 am
White (Vanderbilt University), on Friday, October 8, 2021 Tags: Capital allocation, Executive Compensation, Liquidity, Market conditions, Repurchases, Shareholder value SEC Form 10-K Comments Regarding Climate-Related Disclosures Posted by Brian V. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 9:44 am by Michael Rushford
  The unanimous Second District Court of Appeals ruling in People v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 9:58 am by Kevin Kaufman
California Governor Jerry Brown (D) for colorful vetoes of targeted tax breaks which have helped California maintain some semblance of a broad tax base and improved its fiscal position. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
In Henry Schein, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
The Panopticon Blog has covered the case of Stunt v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 1780. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 4:30 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Glenn Koenig /Los Angeles Times, file) An interesting decision today from the California Supreme Court (ACLU of So. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:51 am by Eugene Volokh
The California Channel does not appear to have any express policy permitting unlicensed use for any purpose.] [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am by Jane Chong
 To borrow the words of law professors Michael Rustad and Thomas Koenig, the current paradigm is one in which “[t]he software industry tends to blame cybercrime, computer intrusions, and viruses on the expertise and sophistication of third party criminals and on careless users who fail to implement adequate security, rather than acknowledging the obvious risks created by their own lack of adequate testing and flawed software design. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
14 May 2012, 7:22 am by Rebecca Shafer, J.D.
Koenig Offers Update From Benefits Review Board Karen Koenig, associate general counsel of the Longshore Benefits Review Board at the U.S. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 11:33 am
Leo, University of San Francisco School of Law, and Alexa Koenig, University of California, Berkeley, School of Law, and University of San Francisco, have published The Gatehouses and Mansions: Fifty Years Later at 6 Annual Review of Law and Social Science 323 (2010). [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 10:00 am by Howard Friedman
The court found that the parole board, while mentioning the programs, did not indicate plaintiff was required to attend, and plaintiff never told the board that the programs conflicted with his religious beliefs.In Koenig v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 2:23 pm
The purchasers further alleged that if they had not been deceived by the labels on the products, they would not have purchased the products, but would have purchased alternative drink products.These allegations satisfied the heightened standard for specifying the who, what, where, and how of fraud, under Rule 9(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court held.Advertisements, Promotional MaterialsThe purchasers' allegations regarding unspecified “commercial advertisements”… [read post]