Search for: "California v. Marks"
Results 41 - 60
of 4,354
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2023, 6:13 pm
See, e.g., California v. [read post]
14 May 2021, 1:11 pm
In Issakhani v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 2:10 am
In Qiao Mu, the accused imported, among other things, counterfeit MagSafe power adapters and iPhone batteries ("Products"), knowing that the Products bore the Apple logo mark and “DESIGNED BY APPLE IN CALIFORNIA” mark. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 3:01 am
The issue of whether IPRs (in that case, copyright) was moveable property within the contemplation of section 44 of the Nigerian Constitution came up as an issue in the case of Musical Copyright Society of Nigeria Limited (MCSN) v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 1:50 pm
Mark Buza [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 1:49 pm
Wilson of the Central District of California, entered the latest ruling in the ongoing saga of the COVID-19 business interruption coverage dispute between celebrity plaintiff’s attorney Mark Geragos and Insurer Travelers. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 10:55 am
Mark Twain may have said that the coldest winter he ever spent was a summer in California. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 5:00 am
The February 2010 issue of California Lawyer has this article on Kwikset Corp. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 6:52 am
Sukumar v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 12:04 pm
West v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 2:12 pm
” Méndez v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 6:49 am
Ceglia v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 4:02 am
During the successful campaign for Proposition 64 in California, reformers cited as an example of the sort of the “shakedown lawsuit” they hoped to eliminate a suit in which Bill Lerach’s class action firm demanded money from lock maker Kwikset because its product was marked “Made in U.S.A. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 6:32 pm
“How a Challenge to California’s Animal Cruelty Law Became a Stealth Abortion Case”: Mark Joseph Stern has this jurisprudence essay online at Slate. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 3:24 pm
Well, the California Supreme Court finally released its opinion in Ross v. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 2:48 pm
Klein (University of California, Los Angeles - School of Law) has posted Martin V. [read post]
4 May 2010, 1:31 pm
It's less common still for the Court of Appeal to hold that no reasonable attorney could have found tenable two of the claims brought by that large law firm and its high profile litigator, Mark Lee.Yet that's precisely what the California Court of Appeal holds here.Justice Mosk dissents. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 2:31 am
Retail Royalty Company v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 9:36 am
The recent ruling by the California Supreme Court in Estrada v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 2:04 pm
By: Mark S. [read post]
