Search for: "California v. Marks"
Results 41 - 60
of 4,347
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2024, 1:34 pm
in a 35 mph zone for over a mile while evading a marked police car with its siren and lights on while driving on the wrong side of the road and nearly hitting other vehicles, and then crashes his car into a brick wall. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 3:59 am
Here is the complaint: Carano v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
As the Supreme Court memorably put it in the case of West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 10:59 am
Q: Veuve Cliquot v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 10:01 am
V. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 8:28 am
[Note: the court cites Facebook v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 7:00 am
Complaint in Superior Court of California (March 20, 2018) Common Cause FEC Complaint re: Michael Cohen et al. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
Trump v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 11:40 am
He contextualizes this technical intervention through the historical innovations that have made their mark in both courts and across the legal domain. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
And since we are in San Diego and I am a former California state securities regulator, let me throw in one more — Regulation CE, a Commission exemption for transactions exempt from qualification under Section 25102(n) of the California Corporations Code.[9] Each exemption differs on particular factors, such as whether general solicitation is permitted, the types of issuers that can use the exemption, the types of investors that can purchase under the exemption, the amount of… [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 10:33 am
Many observers—including Epic CEO Tim Sweeney—have marked this as an unmitigated loss for Epic. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 5:40 am
Georgia Gwinnett County Superior Court Judge Tracie Cason's decision last week in Walters v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 3:46 am
Banc of California, National Association v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
" Id. at 334 (quotation marks omitted). [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
Rogozinski v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 9:30 pm
Mark Graber disputes the significance of the latest discovery of Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman related to whether the President is an Office of the United States for purposes of Section 3 of the fourteenth Amendment (Balkinization).ICYMI: The failed attempt to rename Brown v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm
The Supreme Court will consider the constitutionality of HB20 in NetChoice, LLC v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 3:07 am
County of El Dorado, California and Office of the U.S. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 7:48 am
Greenberg v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
District Court for the Central District of California, Vampire Family Brands accuses Treasury Wine Estates (“TWE”) of infringing upon marks owned by Vampire Family Brands, LLC. [read post]
