Search for: "California v. Marks"
Results 61 - 80
of 4,346
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2022, 12:20 pm
Rothschild, Case No. 1:22-cv-00384, related to trade mark infringement and the sale of NFTs of “MetaBirkins” -pending: motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint denied-; Nike, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 11:09 am
California Teachers Association, affirming the decision below by an equally divided Court. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 3:00 pm
California, which required a warrant to search a cellphone. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 5:31 pm
Lastly, the Court addressed its earlier ruling in Pequignot v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 3:03 pm
The question mark means: I dunno. [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:48 am
Champion Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 6:58 am
SC v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 7:48 pm
This ruling seemingly marks the end of a case with a long procedural history, including appeals to the California and U.S. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 7:51 am
Sukumar v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 10:52 am
The case is entitled Brian Mas v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 2:28 am
Pinkberry, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 1:11 pm
Even in deep-blue California, repeal failed and a reform measure to reduce delay passed. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 5:29 am
See, e.g., Cunningham v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 9:19 am
The case cite is Apple, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 6:27 am
The California Court of Appeals recently issued its decision in Bullock v. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 6:48 am
This ruling marked a shift from the 1985 ruling by a California Court of Appeal in Loral Corp. v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 2:00 am
The court ruled on April 30 in the appeal of Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 2:00 am
The court ruled on April 30 in the appeal of Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 9:45 am
(Indiana) v. [read post]
