Search for: "California v. Mazur"
Results 1 - 17
of 17
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2008, 11:13 pm
Relying on the California Supreme Court's statement in Smith v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 11:56 am
Per the 2006 California Supreme Court ruling in Barrett v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 6:44 am
This week the Palm Center (a research organization at the University of California) filed an amicus brief with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Log Cabin Republicans v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 1:54 pm
(See our discussion of this in Mazur v. eBay; see also the FTC's 2010 enforcement action against Twitter.) [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 4:15 pm
Cases from this year that barely missed the cut: * A.V. v. iParadigms * Mazur v. eBay * Zango v. [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 10:00 am
The court distinguishes Lemmon v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 8:29 pm
” (See Scott Co. of California v. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 5:36 am
It was thus but a step in the long campaign to discourage the Japanese from entering California and to drive out those who were already there.' (Oyama v. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 1:27 pm
Mazur v. eBay Inc., 257 F.R.D. 563, 567 (N.D. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 6:36 pm
Submitting an amici curiae brief (jointly with the Special Needs Alliance and National Housing Law Project) in the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit case of Kimberly DeCambre v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
Winthrop Laboratories, 697 F.2d 222, 229 (8th Cir. 1983).California: Carlin v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 5:00 am
Lederle Laboratories, 819 F.2d 349, 358 (2d Cir. 1987) (applying New York and California law) (quoting Dunn v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
Thus, in California, while “an FDA[] conclusion is not binding . [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
See Larkin v. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 11:50 pm
The Center for Internet and Society blog has posted a series of comments on the California Consumer Privacy Act [pdf] The IpKat blog has a piece by Jessica Banks “Smart watches: a helping hand or sinister culture of surveillance? [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
California Ramirez v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 7:35 am
’s V 2.65% $5.3 billion deal to acquire Plaid Inc., a key player in the financial-technology space. [read post]
