Search for: "California v. Nevada" Results 241 - 260 of 1,233
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2008, 9:50 am
Case Number: 2:2008cv00336 Filed: March 14, 2008 Court: Nevada District Court Oakley, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 2:52 pm by Unknown
Nevada (Prisoner Rights) State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2018.htmlEveri Payments, INC. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 2:52 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Nevada (Prisoner Rights) State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2018.htmlEveri Payments, INC. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 12:17 pm
The certification frenzy continues.The Ninth Circuit has been on a frenetic pace of certifying questions to state supreme courts lately, and back in May, certified its first decision in a while to the California Supreme Court (after already certifying in 2007 to the supreme courts of Oregon, Washington, and Nevada -- indeed, for the latter, twice). [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 4:02 pm by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 174006 (D NV, Oct. 18, 2017), a Nevada federal district court refused to dismiss a Muslim inmate's complaint regarding the timing of his Ramadan meals.In Moir v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 3:12 pm by Jon Sands
§ 2244(d)(1), while a Nevada state prisoner loses under equitable tolling.McMonagle v. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 2:58 am by Walter Olson
“Netherlands Prosecuting Man for Insulting Turkish President Erdogan” [Eugene Volokh] Among articles in the new Cato Supreme Court Review: Robert McNamara and Paul Sherman on NIFLA v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 12:49 pm by William Baude
On the other hand, the Supreme Court’s decision in Calder v. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 11:46 am by Paul E. Freehling
Now, district and appellate court judges in a single federal case pending in the Northern District of California, U.S. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 37788 (D NV, March 22, 2016), a Nevada federal district court dismissed an inmate's complaint that wearing an identification wristband violates his free exercise rights.In Guillory v. [read post]