Search for: "California v. Nevada"
Results 461 - 480
of 1,113
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2016, 9:13 am
The opinion in State of Nevada, et al v. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 6:55 am
” State of Nevada v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 8:57 pm
The case is Sierra Club, et al., v. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 8:41 am
The lawsuits – one filed by a coalition of twenty-one states (State of Nevada et al. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:50 am
” It covers other states as well, including Arizona, Nevada, Hawaii, and Alaska. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 4:53 pm
In Whitney v. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 8:45 am
California,134 S.Ct. 1683 (2014) (reliability of tips and reasonable suspicion), and Alabama v. [read post]
11 Sep 2016, 9:22 am
LEXIS 121707 (ND CA, Sept. 8, 2016), a California federal district court dismissed, with leave to amend, plaintiff's claim that jail deputies refused to allow him to bring a Christian cross into jail.In Brown v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 10:31 am
In 2008’s Doe v. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 10:07 am
Though the Act, Illinois has joined the list of states taking action, legislative or otherwise, limiting the scope of non-competition agreements and other restrictive covenants, such as Massachusetts, Wisconsin, and Nevada (not to mention outright prohibitions in California, Oklahoma and North Dakota). [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 6:00 am
Recently, the Court ruled in Morris v. [read post]
4 Sep 2016, 5:36 am
That might be coming down the pike, but it’s not the holding of the opinion in Wilson v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 11:56 am
Flores is currently the law for employers in California (and other states like Arizona, Oregon, Washington, and Nevada that are in the Ninth Circuit). [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 10:48 am
Employers in Alaska, Arizona, California, Guam, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington are immediately impacted by the Ninth Circuit’s decision as it nullifies the ability of an employer to prevent employees from bringing class and/or collective actions by agreement. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 1:38 pm
Morris v. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 6:23 am
Rptr. 212, 215 (California Court of Appeals 1976) (government obtained name and address of subscriber to particular telephone number); Ensley v. [read post]
21 Aug 2016, 8:56 am
In Aref v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 4:55 pm
The first of the two recent cases, Pulier v. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 8:06 am
With a Salmonella Outbreak raging, might be a good time to ask that question – again. [read post]