Search for: "California v. Nevada"
Results 521 - 540
of 1,110
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm
First, in a July 8, 2015 decision in Acevedo v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 4:01 am
" Bad Boys amended its application to seek a concurrent use registration claiming California, Arizona, and Nevada. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 5:31 am
District Court for the Northern District of California: Luna v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 4:30 am
Today’s case is Flowers v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 10:48 am
A California death-row prisoner loses, while a Nevada death-row prisoner prevails on both guilt- and penalty-phase claims.1. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 12:00 am
In the same case, Merrick v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
The case was Reynolds v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 5:54 am
” Commentary on Michigan v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 3:25 pm
(Rodrigue v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 5:50 am
Try as he might, Nevada State Trooper Greg Monroe could not come up with a sufficient reason to search Straughn Gorman’s RV. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 9:48 am
The argument in the case of California Franchise Tax Board v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 12:05 pm
California Teachers Association 14-915Issue: (1) Whether Abood v. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 5:30 am
LEXIS 77830 (D NV, June 16, 2015), a Nevada federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendation (2015 U.S. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 12:11 pm
The Court’s decision in Coates v. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 9:15 am
In Rowell v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 7:38 am
Dyer v. [read post]
31 May 2015, 7:03 am
LEXIS 67180 (D NV, May 21, 2015), a Nevada federal district court granted a Muslim inmate a preliminary injunction ordering prison officials to provide him with a diet that complies with both the tenets of his Muslim faith and his low sodium medical needs.In Quinn v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 5:44 am
There may be licensing requirements for private process servers, as is the case in New York City, Alaska, Arizona, California, Illinois, Montana, Nevada, and Oklahoma. . . .Other jurisdictions, such as Georgia, require a court order allowing a private person to serve process. [read post]
3 May 2015, 7:34 am
In Herbert v. [read post]
