Search for: "California v. Nevada" Results 521 - 540 of 1,225
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2016, 12:09 pm by Lyle Denniston
   The result in Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 10:37 am by Alexandra Farone
Hyatt [SCOTUSblog materials] that Nevada may not apply a state law that would allow damages against California that are greater than damages that can be awarded against Nevada in similar circumstances. [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 10:13 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 46697 (ED CA, April 5, 2016), a California federal magistrate judge dismissed with leave to amend an inmate's complaint that his religious rights were being infringed by the denial of a vegetarian diet.In Huddleston v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 1:43 pm
 For example, here, the Nevada County Superior Court has more than one authorized judge, but the Truckee branch of that court only has one assigned judge. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 8:36 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 39682 (ED CA, March 25, 2016), a California federal magistrate judge recommended that a Native American inmate be allowed to move ahead with his complaints regarding denial of access to a sweat lodge, to a  spiritual advisor and to religious property.In Seagraves v. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 37788 (D NV, March 22, 2016), a Nevada federal district court dismissed an inmate's complaint that wearing an identification wristband violates his free exercise rights.In Guillory v. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 11:00 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 36133 (D NV, March 21, 2016), a Nevada federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendations (2016 U.S. [read post]
12 Mar 2016, 11:50 am
District Court in Nevada, a suit which continues. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
California Department of Corrections, 2016 U.S. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 12:42 pm by David Urban
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which covers states such as California, Washington, Nevada, and Hawaii, has taken the lead in formulating applicable rules, in particular in landmark cases such as Dahlia v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 9:41 am by Amanda Frost
  But as Baude admits, this intellectually elegant rationale will fall apart if the Court overrules Nevada v. [read post]