Search for: "California v. Nevada"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,119
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2007, 4:59 pm
But in a unique habeas case, three Ninth Circuit judges are sticking to their guns in Smith v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 10:05 am
California, 342 U.S. 165 (1952); Jacobson v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 3:17 pm
See Louisiana v. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 11:25 am
Left to right, the Honorable Judges Wallace and Friedland, and the Honorable District Judge AdelmanFacts: Haines and his friend King were charged with transporting two minor females from Nevada to California to work as prostitutes. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 10:08 am
But if we nonetheless say the crime's not "over" until X gets safely back home, then it seems to me that X can permissibly be charged in California for a crime that occurred in Nevada, since the crime was in "both" places. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 2:00 am
The Democrats still control the Senate (51-D v 46-R) and downtown at White House. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 8:45 am
In fact, in the case Bungie, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 10:51 am
Cung Le v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 5:00 pm
Reno v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 3:45 pm
Kalologie Skincare Medical Group of California , 2014 WL 953442, at *5 (C.D. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 10:00 pm
” Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
White v. [read post]
12 Mar 2016, 11:50 am
District Court in Nevada, a suit which continues. [read post]
16 Jan 2025, 7:31 am
This charge, named after the 1981 California Supreme Court case People v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 3:56 am
In California, the sentence was discretionary, leaving the state courts to figure out exactly what Miller meant. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
Superior Court, 79 P.3d 556, 563 (Cal. 2003).Lower California courts, but not the California Supreme Court, have cited Restatement Third §2 with approval. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 6:42 am
John Gray, Christian Keller, Kyle Martin, and Aaron ShepardCase Number: 15-cv-00551 (United States District Court for the Northern District of California)Case Filed: February 5, 2015Qualifying Judgment/Order: March 2, 2015 3/31/15 6/29/15 2015-30 SEC v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 8:00 am
Rocketinfo Inc. a judgment from Nevada (non-reciprocating) was registered in California (reciprocating) and then registered in BC. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 6:17 am
See The Cupcakery, LLC v. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 10:55 am
For discussion of Judge Benjamin Cardozo’s viewpoint on  self-defense, see pages 15â€"17 of the California and Nevada district attorneys’ amicus brief in McDonald. [read post]
