Search for: "California v. Nevada"
Results 601 - 620
of 1,114
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2014, 10:13 am
Paul Venture Fund, LLC; Minnesota Venture Capital, Inc.; Real Estate of Minnesota, Inc.; and Matrix Venture Capital, Inc.Case number: 10-cv-2166 (United States District Court for the District of Nevada)Case filed: December 14, 2010Qualifying Judgment/Order: June 27, 2014 07/24/2014 10/22/2014 2014-73 SEC v. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 8:00 am
In Haight v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 7:28 am
In Toyota Motor Credit v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 7:01 am
” Nine states follow community property principles: Arizona, California, Idaho, Louisiana, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas, Washington, and Wisconsin (also Puerto Rico). [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 11:06 pm
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California recently signed an order on a stipulation (pdf) in Murphy v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 11:16 am
So far, there has only been one Colorado case, Coats v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
However, Conte was decided by but one of several California appellate courts, and we understand that they don’t have to follow each other’s decisions. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 3:19 pm
In applying these settled rules, and holding the eighth amendment was not a “new project,” the Court of Appeal distinguished decisions cited by appellant CAAP — Center for Sierra Nevada Conservation v. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 11:46 am
LEXIS 93241 (D NV, July 9, 2014), a Nevada federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendation (2014 U.S. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 11:08 am
Judge Margaret McKeownThe Ninth has endorsed a radical proposition: CJA counsel can ask to get paid for their work.United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 6:47 am
Maryland – Hershey v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 8:39 am
<> In Defense of Animals v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 8:36 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> In Defense of Animals v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 11:57 am
Hawk v. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 5:50 pm
In Wills v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 4:25 am
El estado de California defendió el referéndum y el juez de distrito federal expresó que dicha enmienda constitucional afecta el derecho fundamental al matrimonio reconocido en Loving v. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 10:43 am
Supreme Court decided Missouri v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 4:15 am
In Kyles v. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 9:26 am
In the second significant order to come off the civil side of the California Supreme Court’s docket in the wake of Wednesday’s conference, the Court entered a “grant-and-transfer” order in Burdick v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 5:59 pm
So far, no federal court of appeals has issued a final ruling on the issue since the Supreme Court’s decision last June, in United States v. [read post]
