Search for: "California v. Nevada" Results 641 - 660 of 1,232
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Law Div. 2005).Heeding presumptions are something that exists in some states (Massachusetts, Missouri, Oklahoma), doesn’t in others (California, Connecticut, Alabama), and is limited in still others (New, Jersey, Pennsylvania, Texas). [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 4:07 am by Robin Shea
The Ninth Circuit hears appeals from federal courts in Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Washington state, and Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 3:01 pm by LTA-Editor
Other states with this requirement include California, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, and Pennsylvania. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 8:34 am by Lyle Denniston
  That decision, in the case of United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 11:52 am
 Because, typically, in any given week, there's something -- often, many things -- with which to disagree in the published decisions of the Ninth Circuit and California Court of Appeal. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 8:40 am
The states that have such laws (or other laws that have this effect), as best I can tell, are California, Colorado, Connecticut, Hawaii, Indiana, Louisiana, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New York, North Dakota, Oregon, South Carolina, West Virginia, and Wyoming. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 3:12 pm by Jon Sands
§ 2244(d)(1), while a Nevada state prisoner loses under equitable tolling.McMonagle v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 10:13 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Paul Venture Fund, LLC; Minnesota Venture Capital, Inc.; Real Estate of Minnesota, Inc.; and Matrix Venture Capital, Inc.Case number: 10-cv-2166 (United States District Court for the District of Nevada)Case filed: December 14, 2010Qualifying Judgment/Order: June 27, 2014 07/24/2014 10/22/2014 2014-73 SEC v. [read post]