Search for: "California v. Polk" Results 1 - 20 of 80
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2014, 4:33 pm by Patricia Salkin
California-Nevada Annual Conference of the Methodist Church v City and County of San Francisco, 2014 WL 6665915 (ND Ca. 11/24/2014) The opinion can be accessed at: https://cases.justia.com/federal/district-courts/california/candce/4:2011cv02338/240674/168/0.pdf? [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 4:33 pm by Patricia Salkin
California-Nevada Annual Conference of the Methodist Church v City and County of San Francisco, 2014 WL 6665915 (ND Ca. 11/24/2014) The opinion can be accessed at: https://cases.justia.com/federal/district-courts/california/candce/4:2011cv02338/240674/168/0.pdf? [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 3:11 am by SHG
Here are the relevant statutory provisions, from the California Labor Code (dating back to 1937): 1101. [read post]
4 May 2010, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Fenrich of Davis Polk & Wardwell presented the defense position. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 3:33 am by Broc Romanek
California Court Confirms Enforceability of Delaware Forum-Selection Bylaws As noted in this Wachtell Lipton memo, the California Court of Appeal recently became the second appellate court outside of Delaware – in Drulias v. 1st Century Bancshares – to recognize the enforceability of forum-selection bylaws adopted by Delaware corporations designating the Delaware Court of Chancery as the exclusive forum for the litigation of intracorporate & fiduciary… [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 3:40 am by Broc Romanek
Here’s news from Davis Polk’s Ning Chiu: The SEC announced a whistleblower award of nearly half a million dollars to a former company officer whose report of misconduct resulted in an SEC enforcement action. [read post]
29 May 2011, 6:40 am by Howard Friedman
The dismissal was based on failure to pay the required filing fee.In Polk v. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 3:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“An attorney may not be held liable for failing to act outside the scope of a retainer” (Attallah v Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy, LLP, 168 AD3d 1026, 1028 [2d Dept 2019]; see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 435 [2007]). [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 5:52 am
Harvey (Duke University) and David Hirshleifer (University of California), on Tuesday, January 5, 2021 Tags: Agency costs, Peer review Statement by Commissioner Roisman on NYSE Primary Direct Listing Proposal Posted by Elad L. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 6:04 am
Pastuszenski, Goodwin Procter LLP, on Tuesday, July 18, 2017 Tags: California, Class actions, Jurisdiction, New York, PSLRA, Securities Act, Securities litigation, Shareholder suits, SLUSA, State law, Supreme Court CalPERS v. [read post]