Search for: "California v. Russell"
Results 1 - 20
of 748
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2010, 11:55 am
The California Supreme Court unanimously affirms.Tough to say that this case is any worse than your typical murder-of-police-officers case. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 6:59 am
The complaint in Russell v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 7:46 am
Last week, California's 6th District Court of Appeals issued its decision in Smith v. [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 2:12 pm
On Thursday morning, the Illinois Supreme Court filed its decision in Russell v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 11:00 am
California, a Fourth Amendment case on third-party consent. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:41 am
Russell, Kevin Russell, Lesbians, Lisa A. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 6:43 am
Former NBA legend Bill Russell has recently brought a suit against the National Collegiate Athletic Association (“NCAA”) (Russell v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 6:43 am
Former NBA legend Bill Russell has recently brought a suit against the National Collegiate Athletic Association (“NCAA”) (Russell v. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 9:11 am
Russell was acting in conjunction with law enforcement. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 10:08 am
Can't be.The California Court of Appeal, however, goes the other way. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 12:26 pm
Russell G. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 7:09 pm
The petition of the day is: Riley v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 9:32 pm
,dba AT&T California v. linkLine Communications (07-512). [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 11:09 am
California Teachers Association, affirming the decision below by an equally divided Court. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 11:56 am
Superior Court of California could hardly surprise anybody who noticed the court’s near-unanimous ruling last month in BNSF Railway Co. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:09 am
ShareThe holding of Wednesday’s decision in Viking River Cruises v. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 8:36 am
Russell - federal appellate procedure Panetti v. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 9:33 am
Meleyco didn't raise this argument, nor did the Court of Appeal address it -- and it seems like the California courts pretty much routinely hold that this exception doesn't apply when an attorney violates a court order, on the theory that once the judge hears your objection and then rules against you and tells you not to do it again, that's no longer "advocacy" since the court's already ruled against you. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 10:15 am
Eskridge Rico v. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 3:00 am
—Bertrand Russell 1Lambert v. [read post]
