Search for: "California v. Sierra Club"
Results 21 - 40
of 284
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2019, 1:35 pm
Sierra Club stayed an injunction and let the administration access funds that were frozen by decisions of a federal district court in California in May and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (agreeing with the district court) on July 3. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 5:21 pm
Sierra Club v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 8:57 pm
The case is Sierra Club, et al., v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 11:30 am
Sierra Club v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 1:43 pm
Mnuchin (District of Columbia) Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction Defendants’ Opposition to Motion for Preliminary Injunction Plaintiffs’ Reply Memorandum in Support of its Application for Preliminary Injunction Opinion Sierra Club v. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 11:44 am
The Sierra Club was. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 1:56 pm
Sierra Club, et al. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 11:15 am
The Latino Issues Forum and Sierra Club challenged U.S. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 10:34 am
Sierra Club et al. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 8:27 am
The Sierra Club files a writ to stop a Wal-Mart store, and loses. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 11:49 am
In Sierra Club v. [read post]
California Court Tentatively Dismisses Monstano’s Lawsuit Against OEHHA to Block Addition of Glyphos
1 Feb 2017, 1:11 pm
Graham A tentative ruling issued January 26, 2017, in Monsanto Company v. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 9:00 am
Nov. 18, 2022), the Honorable James Donato of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted a motion to dismiss claims brought against defendants Coca-Cola, Blue Triton Brands, and Niagara Bottling (collectively the “Defendants”) by plaintiff individuals and Sierra Club (“Plaintiffs”). [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 2:47 pm
Sierra Club v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 7:23 am
The State of California, the Sierra Forest Legacy, the Center for Biological Diversity, the Natural Resources Defense Council, the Sierra Club and the Wilderness Society claim that the Forest Service violated NEPA both by failing to consider short-term impacts of the 2004 Framework and by failing to disclose and rebut expert opposition. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 7:30 pm
Three more amicus briefs have been filed in Winter v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 10:51 am
City and County of San Francisco (2019) ___ Cal.App.5th ___ (“South of Market”), is the first published decision in which the court applies the principles articulated by the California Supreme Court in the recent Sierra Club v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 2:32 pm
Sierra Club, et al. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:49 pm
Abbott Sierra Club v. [read post]
26 May 2016, 6:50 pm
Another case offering an opportunity to clarify the CEQA standard of review is Sierra Club v Fresno. [read post]
