Search for: "California v. Southern Pacific Co." Results 1 - 20 of 83
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
(As discussed here, here, and here, the employment status of college athletes remains an open question under two ongoing cases before the NLRB involving the University of Southern California and Dartmouth, respectively.) [read post]
(As discussed here, here, and here, the employment status of college athletes remains an open question under two ongoing cases before the NLRB involving the University of Southern California and Dartmouth, respectively.) [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 10:00 am by Nicholas Gebelt
In an attempt to make things more precise, our own Judge Albert — building on Pacific First Bank v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Richard Zelichov and Trevor T. Garmey
Securities Litigation, 768 F.3d 1046 (9th Cir. 2014) (violations of Section 303 do not give rise to private right of action under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5) with Stratte-McClure v. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The US experience, as shown by securities class actions such as Owens Corning v National Union Fire Insurance Co [6], indicates that the construction of exclusions is not a simple issue. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 7:35 am by Kristian Soltes
’s V 2.65% $5.3 billion deal to acquire Plaid Inc., a key player in the financial-technology space. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
Following the long-lasting dispute against Grenade Beverage, the California federal court awarded the cat’s owner the sum of $710,001 for the copyright and trade mark infringement. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 11:45 am
Southern Pacific Transportation Co., 233 Cal.App.3d 347, 352 (1991)].Turning to the language of the agreement, the court noted that the agreement granted rights to use the licensed property “in” the Product Category [non-alcoholic beverages], rather than rights “to” the Product Category. [read post]