Search for: "California v. Southern Pacific Co." Results 21 - 40 of 86
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2015, 1:25 pm
Triangle-Pacific Corp., 799 A.2d 95, 107-08 (Pa. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 10:00 am by Nicholas Gebelt
In an attempt to make things more precise, our own Judge Albert — building on Pacific First Bank v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:34 am by stevemehta
Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 6:42 am
In this paper co-authored with Joseph Doherty of UCLA Law, Lynn challenges some recent influential work on bankruptcy (in particular, Douglas’s 2002 paper with 1985 Chicago Law grad and now-University of Southern California Dean Bob Rasmussen). [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 1:42 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Many of these new offices launched under the Newmark name such as “Newmark Partners,” “Newmark of Southern California,” “KTR Newmark,” and “Newmark Pacific. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 10:39 am by Avery Schmitz
The event will feature Sophia Besch, fellow in the Carnegie Endowment’s Europe Program; Alper Coşkun, senior fellow in the Carnegie Endowment’s Europe Program; Erika Olson, deputy assistant secretary of state for policy in southern Europe and the Caucasus; and Sinan Ülgen, senior fellow at Carnegie Europe in Brussels. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 3:19 pm
Southern California Edison Co., 955 F. 2d 1373 (1992) it had joined its sister circuits in holding that claims of price squeezing under Section 2 are viable against monopolists in regulated industries. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 11:39 am by IncNow
Southern Pacific Railroad Co., the court extended that personhood to artificial business entities. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 11:45 am
Southern Pacific Transportation Co., 233 Cal.App.3d 347, 352 (1991)].Turning to the language of the agreement, the court noted that the agreement granted rights to use the licensed property “in” the Product Category [non-alcoholic beverages], rather than rights “to” the Product Category. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 5:45 pm by Brad Pauley
Southern California Gas Co., S188956 —Review Granted and Held—January 26, 2011 The issue presented is whether it was reasonably foreseeable that a car would drive off the road and strike a gas meter assembly over 11 feet from the curb, making a gas company liable for the death of a young woman who died in the accident. [read post]