Search for: "California v. Southern Pacific Co." Results 41 - 60 of 86
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2013, 6:11 am by Victoria VanBuren
  Dr Strong, who is qualified as a lawyer at the New York and Illinois bars and as a solicitor of the Supreme Court of England and Wales, holds a Ph.D. in law from the University of Cambridge, a D.Phil. from the University of Oxford, a J.D. from Duke University, an M.P.W. from the University of Southern California and a B.A. from the University of California. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 5:37 am by Ben Rubin
Southern California Edison Co. (1999) 74 Cal.App.4th 744, held that Edison was strictly liable in inverse condemnation for the damage to the telephone cable. [read post]
7 May 2012, 3:00 am by Terry Hart
The landscape of Southern California: was not only spectacular but extraordinarily varied. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 8:13 am
She then moved to Southern California to become a judicial law clerk, 1st for Judge Carolyn B. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 8:00 am by Bruce Nye
Let's review how tort legal duty works under California law: In Bigbee v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 11:02 am by Kiera Flynn
Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (9th Cir.)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioner's reply State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 3:00 pm by Amy Howe
Independent Living of Southern California, a challenge to California’s Medicaid reimbursement rates, followed by Reynolds v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am by rbm3
GLICKSMAN Stanford, California: Stanford Economics and Finance, 2011 KF3790 .E27 2011 See Catalog Children -- Legal status, laws, etc. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am by rbm3
GLICKSMAN Stanford, California: Stanford Economics and Finance, 2011 KF3790 .E27 2011 See Catalog Children -- Legal status, laws, etc. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 8:12 pm by Christa Culver
Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd.Docket: 10-770Issue(s): Whether, contrary to this Court's decision in KSR International Co. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 5:45 pm by Brad Pauley
Southern California Gas Co., S188956 —Review Granted and Held—January 26, 2011 The issue presented is whether it was reasonably foreseeable that a car would drive off the road and strike a gas meter assembly over 11 feet from the curb, making a gas company liable for the death of a young woman who died in the accident. [read post]