Search for: "California v. Texas"
Results 161 - 180
of 4,423
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2022, 1:29 pm
The Pueblo (and also the Alabama-Coushatta), by contrast, argue that the reference to “prohibited” activities is a short-hand reference to the Supreme Court’s 1987 decision in California v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 11:56 am
Superior Court of California could hardly surprise anybody who noticed the court’s near-unanimous ruling last month in BNSF Railway Co. v. [read post]
27 May 2015, 12:46 pm
So, while Texas hates to look to California for, pretty much, anything, and while Texas and California law often diverge significantly, on this specific issue it pays to take note of what California companies have been cooking in their own courts. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 6:00 am
Recall last Term’s California v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 10:34 am
Similarly, in Gill v. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 8:32 am
Newsom signed the law amid the Supreme Court’s debate on overturning Roe v. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 9:08 pm
California v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 12:10 pm
Texas] Today during oral argument in California v. [read post]
12 Dec 2020, 10:20 am
Deciphering, rewriting, and potentially retitling Justice Alito’s separate statement in Texas v. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 9:17 pm
Ryan LLC v. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 8:16 am
The Supreme Court will hear arguments in Dobbs v. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 9:00 pm
Hoover v. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 1:25 pm
Ingrid V. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 11:30 am
This week, Hayes Holderness (Richmond) reviews Mary Leto Pareja (New Mexico), California v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 11:02 am
In Sander v. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 9:00 am
On Tuesday at 10 a.m., the justices will hear oral argument in California v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 6:51 am
Balli, 144 Tex. 195, 190 S.W.2d 71 (1944), cert. denied Texas v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 12:02 pm
Ashutosh Avinash Bhagwat (University of California, Davis - School of Law) has posted Assembly Resurrected (Texas Law Review, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
27 May 2011, 5:49 am
One of the defendants in Texas, Interwoven, began the litigation, not in Texas, but in the Northern District of California by filing suit against Vertical Computer Systems, Inc. seeking a declaration that the Vertical patents were invalid and were not infringed by Interwoven. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 10:58 am
Recently, the California Supreme Court issued Harris v. [read post]
