Search for: "California v. The Little Sisters of the Poor" Results 21 - 40 of 52
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2020, 3:36 am by Edith Roberts
” At National Review, Alexandra DeSanctis weighs in on Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 2:11 pm by Amy Howe
With the announcement that they have agreed to review Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am by John Elwood
New Relists Patterson v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 1:23 pm
No published opinions from either the Ninth Circuit or the California appellate courts (thus far) today. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 7:29 am by Howard Friedman
Supreme Court today denied review in Little Sisters of the Poor v. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
In short, no persuasive arguments have been mounted against the disclosure requirement.The non-disclosure advocates strangely echo the Little Sisters of the Poor (in the Zubik v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 8:47 am by Marty Lederman
Eighteen of the petitioners, including Little Sisters of the Poor, offer their employees access to a "church plan. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 9:15 pm by Walter Olson
California Teachers Association, the public employee union dues case; the Obamacare religious exemption cases including Little Sisters of the Poor v. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 12:07 pm by Helen Alvare
What seems highly uncertain, however, is what a majority of the Court would say respecting the federal government’s “compelling interest” in forcing the Little Sisters of the Poor and other religious institutions (which are not houses of worship) to insure contraceptives and early abortifacients for their employees and their female children. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 12:15 pm by John Elwood
Manning, 14-1132; and Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by Amy Howe
” In a post at the Petri-Flom Center’s Bill of Health Blog, Greg Lipper analyzes (and criticizes) the arguments made by the Cato Institute in its amicus brief in the challenge by the Little Sisters of the Poor to the Affordable Care Act’s birth-control mandate. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 7:01 am
AB 2034 is now before the California Senate Appropriations Committee. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 5:49 am by Amy Howe
On Friday afternoon, the Court issued its much-anticipated order in Little Sisters of the Poor v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 5:55 am by Amy Howe
Gans has an overview of the pending challenges by religiously affiliated employers to the Affordable Care Act’s birth control mandate — including the one by the Little Sisters of the Poor, who have asked the Court to block their obligation to comply with the law. [read post]