Search for: "California v. The Little Sisters of the Poor"
Results 21 - 40
of 53
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2020, 3:57 am
At Reason’s Volokh Conspiracy blog, Samuel Bray runs down the amicus briefs and related articles discussing “the scope of the injunction” in Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 3:36 am
” At National Review, Alexandra DeSanctis weighs in on Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 2:11 pm
With the announcement that they have agreed to review Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am
New Relists Patterson v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 1:23 pm
No published opinions from either the Ninth Circuit or the California appellate courts (thus far) today. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 7:29 am
Supreme Court today denied review in Little Sisters of the Poor v. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 4:20 am
Little Sisters of the Poor. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 8:02 am
Little Sisters of the Poor: On YouTube, via this link. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 2:35 pm
Yet this case is a poor vehicle for doing so. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 7:31 am
In Burwell v. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm
In short, no persuasive arguments have been mounted against the disclosure requirement.The non-disclosure advocates strangely echo the Little Sisters of the Poor (in the Zubik v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 7:33 am
See Little Sisters of the Poor Home for the Aged v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 8:47 am
Eighteen of the petitioners, including Little Sisters of the Poor, offer their employees access to a "church plan. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 9:15 pm
California Teachers Association, the public employee union dues case; the Obamacare religious exemption cases including Little Sisters of the Poor v. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 12:07 pm
What seems highly uncertain, however, is what a majority of the Court would say respecting the federal government’s “compelling interest” in forcing the Little Sisters of the Poor and other religious institutions (which are not houses of worship) to insure contraceptives and early abortifacients for their employees and their female children. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 12:15 pm
Manning, 14-1132; and Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
” In a post at the Petri-Flom Center’s Bill of Health Blog, Greg Lipper analyzes (and criticizes) the arguments made by the Cato Institute in its amicus brief in the challenge by the Little Sisters of the Poor to the Affordable Care Act’s birth-control mandate. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 7:01 am
AB 2034 is now before the California Senate Appropriations Committee. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 5:49 am
On Friday afternoon, the Court issued its much-anticipated order in Little Sisters of the Poor v. [read post]
