Search for: "California v. United States" Results 181 - 200 of 13,701
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2012, 1:44 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
In reaching its conclusion, the Court of Appeals relied on the April 2011 United States Supreme Court’s landmark decision in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 9:14 am by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law The United States Supreme Court has granted certiorari in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates (NIFLA) v. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 9:31 am by Tryn T. Stimart and Jean E. Dassie
This post is intended as a snapshot of the CRISPR-Cas9 legal landscape in the United States. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 7:14 am by marcorandazza
A man was arrested for wearing a jacket with a political message on it while in the history exhibit at the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 3:01 pm
And, in the third paragraph of your latest appeal, Judge Beezer describes your status for the reader with the following language:"Gadda has now been disbarred by the State of California, the BIA, the United States District Court for Northern District of California and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 10:19 pm by Irina Tarsis
Artistic and legal minds want to know "Does the California Resale Right Act  (the "Act") violate the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution, U.S. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 9:00 am
On January 15, the United States District Court for the Central District of California granted Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment in Arconic, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 2:13 pm
  He filed a direct appeal, claiming that he wasn't guilty because he just "imported" meth from Guam to California, and since both of those places are in the United States, that doesn't count as "importing" the drug. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 12:15 am
Article I, Section 10 of the United States Constitution prohibits a state from passing any law impairing the obligation of contracts. [read post]