Search for: "California v. United States"
Results 241 - 260
of 13,701
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2023, 12:15 am
Now, United States District Court Judge John A. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 11:45 am
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 1:18 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 3:12 pm
Stan Lee, No C-10-3442, United States District Court, Northern District of California Can an 87 year old comic book icon join six other super heroes in his new comic book creation and become the Super Seven? [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 2:41 am
Apte v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 10:15 am
The decision, Chamber of Commerce of the United States et al. v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 5:03 pm
See Morales v. [read post]
2 May 2017, 3:33 pm
King (7th Cir. 2003) 349 F.3d 964 (King) and United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 1:00 pm
United States Abramski v. [read post]
2 Oct 2021, 5:19 pm
” “California courts may exercise jurisdiction over nonresidents ‘on any basis not inconsistent with the Constitution of this state or of the United States. [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 9:11 am
The ruling rejected a challenge to AB 540, a California law that allows students who have attended California high schools for three years and received their diploma or GED to pay in-state tuition rates at public colleges and universities in California. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:00 pm
In R.S. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:01 pm
United States, 509 U.S. 602 (1993). [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 12:38 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 10:37 am
United States, 140 S. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 1:30 pm
The Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law After Bench Trial by United Stated District Court Judge William Alsup (Northern District of California) in Gutierrez v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 6:48 pm
ShareOn Friday the Supreme Court issued its decision in United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 4:53 am
As we wrote here, in January 2020, state court Judge William Highberger issued a decision holding that the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act (“FAAAA”) preempts use of California’s version of the “ABC” test (as adopted by the California Supreme Court in Dynamex Operations West Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:35 pm
This point was cleared up by the United States Supreme Court case called Flores-Figueroa v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 4:41 pm
As we’ve noted, rule 8.548 of the California Rules of Court allows the United States Supreme Court, a United States Court of Appeals, or a state, territory, or commonwealth court of last resort to ask the California Supreme Court to answer California legal questions, and the California high court more often than not agrees to answer the questions. [read post]
