Search for: "California v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 13,694
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2019, 3:29 pm
In the 5-4 decision in Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 9:25 am
According to a recent filing with the California federal district court in the United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 3:00 am
In Juul Labs v. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 8:21 am
” The plaintiff was not based in the State of California. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 6:52 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 5:24 am
§ 2701 et seq.), the United States Secretary of the Interior (Interior Secretary) may permit casino-style gaming on certain land taken into federal trust for an Indian tribe, so long as the Governor of the state where the land is located concurs. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 7:11 am
United States ,” which will lead you to all the posts. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:36 am
This is the first published California decision addressing the issue since the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 9:39 am
Chin is a Professor of Law at the University of California, Davis, School of Law, and Miller is Vice Dean and Bilby Professor of Law at the University of Arizona, James E. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 10:24 am
The recent United States Supreme Court ruling in United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 3:31 pm
Commentary on United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 12:07 pm
Last week, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California unsealed the indictment in the United States of America v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 3:45 pm
In Sullivan v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 12:15 pm
In Nitro-Lift Techs. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 3:02 pm
Last week, the Trump administration filed a petition asking the Supreme Court to hear United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 7:56 pm
The United States Supreme Court's decision in Navarette v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 11:59 am
He contends that this violated his rights under the Fourth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and under California state law. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:00 am
Second, the plaintiffs asserted claims on behalf of over 100 members of a proposed class of consumers throughout the United States, including class members from states other than Delaware or California. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 12:45 pm
United States. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 7:10 am
(“Apple”) appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“CAFC”) from an adverse decision in the District Court for the Central District of California in an infringement suit filed by the California Institute […] The post <i>CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY V. [read post]
