Search for: "California v. United States" Results 161 - 180 of 12,651
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2017, 1:35 pm by Ronald Mann
But since it has no home State in the United States, that means that in that situation, there’s no place for plaintiffs to come together and sue that person, correct? [read post]
7 May 2012, 8:35 pm by Dwight Sullivan
NCIS, No. 3:10-cv-01879-WQH-MDD, in the United States District Court for the Sourthern District of California. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 8:48 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT EAST BAY SANCTUARY COVENANT, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 12:15 pm by Kevin
United States v. 1855.6 Pounds of American Paddlefish Meat and 982.34 Pounds of American Paddlefish Caviar (hereinafter, United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 3:00 pm
He is a United Kingdom citizen and non- immigrant alien, living in the United States pursuant to a valid E-2 Visa, who at all relevant times has been residing in Sonoma, California. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 10:00 am by Dan Ernst
California and American Speech Law at the Wilson Center, 6th Floor Moynihan Board Room, Monday, November 9, 2015, 4:00-5:30pm:The United States has the world's most permissive speech laws. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 4:21 pm by Sheppard Mullin
On Wednesday, April 27, 2011, the United States Supreme Court decided AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
Worley have posted Evidence that the President is an "Officer of the United States" for Purposes of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment (Southern California Law Review, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 4:37 pm by H. Scott Leviant
Request under California Rules of Court rule 8.548, that this court decide a question of California law presented in a matter pending in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 12:16 pm by Bryan Hawkins
”  The lawsuit was filed in 2008, prior to the United States Supreme Court’s 2011 decision in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:44 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 9:00 am by Garrett D. Trego
Aug. 22, 2016), the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted the motion, but allowed the municipalities to amend their complaints as to their nuisance causes of action. [read post]
In reaching its conclusion, the Court of Appeals relied on the April 2011 United States Supreme Court’s landmark decision in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 9:14 am by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law The United States Supreme Court has granted certiorari in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates (NIFLA) v. [read post]