Search for: "California v. United States Environmental Protection Agency"
Results 1 - 20
of 554
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2023, 2:34 pm
Environmental Protection Agency, narrowing the scope of the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) regulatory authority under the Clean Water Act (CWA). [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 10:00 pm
In United States of America v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 10:00 pm
In United States of America v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 10:00 pm
In United States of America v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 10:00 pm
In United States of America v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 10:00 pm
In United States of America v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 10:00 pm
In United States of America v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 4:13 pm
United States (Fed.Cir. 2000) 220 F.3d at 1368). [read post]
31 May 2023, 11:45 am
Environmental Protection Agency’s recent rulemaking adopting a new definition of WOTUS for CWA purposes. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 11:31 am
As previously reported, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted EPA’s motions to dismiss for failure to state an affirmative “agency action” that would trigger section 7. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 11:45 am
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
31 May 2018, 9:01 pm
As I explain in more detail below as I parse the complaint in the United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 3:00 am
WATER QUALITY Clarke v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 3:00 am
Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
Two separate classes of landowners are included in the suit as well as the United States. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 1:54 pm
Environmental Protection Agency in regulating discharges of fill or other pollutants into wetlands and other waters. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 12:04 pm
That’s true for two related reasons: first, the sprawling Ninth Circuit encompasses nine different states (including California) and several territories in the Western United States that together generate considerable environmental litigation. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:44 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 3:40 pm
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California agreed, and held that the amended complaint was too ambiguous as to which affirmative agency actions required EPA to consult about trifluralin before registering it. [read post]
