Search for: "Campbell v. Campbell" Results 1 - 20 of 2,449
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2018, 6:58 am by John McFarland
This month the Texas Supreme Court refused to hear the case of Lindemann Properties, Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 2:15 am by Douglas McGregor, Brodies LLP
The relevant statutory provisions together with a summary of the approaches adopted in the lower courts can be found in Case Preview: Campbell v Gordon. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 2:38 pm by Daily Record Staff
Appellant presents the following question for our review: “Whether the evidence produced at trial was legally sufficient for the jury to find Campbell guilty of rape in ... [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
It is now over ten years since the landmark decision in Campbell v MGN Ltd ([2004] 2 AC 457) established the misuse of private information (“MOPI”) tort (any lingering doubt that it might not be a tort has been eradicated by the Court of Appeal decision in Vidal-Hall v Google Inc [2015] EWCA Civ 311). [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 3:52 am
Model Naomi Campbell lost her bid to have a New York personal injury suit against her tossed out. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 7:55 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
A previous Slaw article (which you can read here) discussed the recent British Columbia Court of Appeal decision that confirmed that the stringent test set out in Health Sciences Assoc of BC v Campbell River and North Island Transition Society (Campbell River) to determine if there was a duty to accommodate based on family status and if there is a prima facie case of discrimination based on family status, continues to be the applicable test in British Columbia. [read post]