Search for: "Campbell v. Campbell" Results 161 - 180 of 3,293
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2017, 2:26 am
Author Ssolbergj Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International Licence Source Wikipedia Jane Lambert IPEC (Mr Recorder Campbell), Scomadi Ltd and Another v RA Engineering Co. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 12:50 pm
Border Terrier Author Biffo4tanks, Licence CC BY-SA 3,0 Source Wikipedia Border Terriers Jane Lambert Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (Mr Recorder Campbell) The Kennel Club Ltd v Micro-ID Ltd [2019] EWHC 1639 (IPEC) (25 June 2019)  The Kennel Club is the UK authority for dog breeding, dog shows and other matters relating to dogs. [read post]
22 May 2008, 6:46 am
Daniel Sokol Charles Campbell of Faulkner University, Jones School of Law discusses A "Plausible" Showing after Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 12:00 am by Lawrence Solum
” Purporting to rely on the Court’s adoption of “transformative use” as a way of understanding the fair use doctrine in Campbell v. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 3:03 am
Royal Courts of Justice Author David Castor Reproduced pursuant to CCO 1.0 Source Wikipedia Royal Courts of Justice Jane Lambert Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (Mr Recorder Campbell QC) NXP BV v ID Management Systems [2019] EWHC 1902 (IPEC) (31 July 2019) This was an action for trade mark infringement. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 3:17 am
 Jane LambertCourt of Appeal (Lady Justice Thirwall and Lords Justices Arnold and Birss) Advanced Bionics AG and  Another v Med-El Elektromedizinische Gerate GmbH [2023] EWCA Civ 637 (9 June 2023)This was an appeal against Mr Campbell Forsyth KC's revocation of European patent (UK)  3 138 605 entitled "MRI-safe disk magnet for implants" ("the patent") on grounds of obviousness over PCT [read post]
11 May 2016, 2:25 pm
Allstate Insurance Co., Allstate asked the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to answer the hypothetical question raised in Campbell-Ewald v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 3:17 pm by Tim Clancy
The appeals court made their decision to follow the holding of Atkins v. [read post]