Search for: "Campbell v. Kennedy" Results 81 - 100 of 138
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 12:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Fifth Breakout Session Copyright Theory Shyamkrishna Balganesh, The Uneasy Case Against Copyright Trolls Three things: unpack the idea of copyright trolling, an undertheorized idea compared to patent trolling. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
For example, some of the more noteworthy books by Justices concern the Civil War, such as the following: Salmon Portland Chase, How the South Rejected Compromise in the Peace Conference of 1861 (1863) John Archibald Campbell, Reminiscences and Documents Relating to the Civil War During the Year 1865 (1887) William O. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:10 am by Edward Hartnett
On Tuesday, December 6, the Court heard argument in a case – Martel v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 3:57 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
, IPBiz expected an allusion to the Mad Men episode Nixon v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 4:16 am by tracey
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) K v L [2011] EWCA Civ 550 (13 May 2011) AXA Sunlife Services Plc v Campbell Martin Ltd & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 549 (12 May 2011) BDW Trading Ltd (t/a Barratt North London) v JM Rowe (Investments) Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 548 (12 May 2011) AP (Trinidad & Tobago) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 551 (12 May 2011) Kennedy v The Information Commissioner & Anor [2011] EWCA… [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:27 pm by pfriedman
The proposition that an appropriation must comment on the original to constitute fair use originates in commentary on Campbell v. [read post]