Search for: "Campbell v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 2,227
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2024, 12:25 pm by Lynn L. Bergeson
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published notice of a proposed settlement agreement to address a petition for writ of mandamus filed by the Ecology Center, the Center for Environmental Health, United Parents Against Lead & Other Environmental Hazards, and the Sierra Club in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (Ecology Center v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 12:25 pm by Lynn L. Bergeson
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published notice of a proposed settlement agreement to address a petition for writ of mandamus filed by the Ecology Center, the Center for Environmental Health, United Parents Against Lead & Other Environmental Hazards, and the Sierra Club in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (Ecology Center v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 7:23 am
 From an amicus brief in National Rifle Association v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:28 am by centerforartlaw
All rights reserved,” denoting the exclusive rights of the copyright holders, the Andy Warhol Foundation, to the image, and Campbell Soup Co. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:09 am by Kurt Lash
Akhil Reed Amar (Yale) and Vikram David Amar (Illinois) in Trump v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 1:00 pm by ernst
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co v Campbell (2003): The Misguided Legacy of ProportionalityCatherine M Sharkey (New York University, USA)14. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 2:32 am by Rebekka Thomas (Bristows)
Finally, the Court considered the interim decision of Pumfrey J in Quads 4 Kids v Campbell [2006] EWHC 2482 (Ch), which concerned eBay’s Verified Rights Owner (“VeRO”) programme. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Stanford Law School's profile of Jud Campbell, who recently joined its faculty (Stanford Lawyer). [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 4:29 pm by Thomas James
The decision is significant because it finally reined in the “transformative use” doctrine that the Court first announced in Campbell v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 6:49 pm by Chuck Cosson
While Microsoft has stated it’s extending this offer on the basis few claims are likely to succeed,[21] it also indicates that Microsoft believes there will be some claims that survive to settlement or even to judgment, and for which it would be optimal for Microsoft to control the litigation (rather than its customer). [read post]