Search for: "Campbell v. State"
Results 181 - 200
of 2,201
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2011, 3:55 am
The Fourteenth Amendment means that a local or state government employer may not involuntarily retire a public employee from his or her work without due process of law, citing Board of Regents v Roth, 408 U.S. 564 and Cleveland Board of Education v Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532; and3. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 2:14 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) MD (Gambia), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 121 (17 February 2011) Test Claimants In the Thin Cap Group Litigation v HM Revenue and Customs [2011] EWCA Civ 127 (18 February 2011) Axa Sun Life Services Plc v Campbell Martin Ltd & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 133 (18 February 2011) Welford v Transport for London [2011] EWCA Civ 129 (18 February 2011) Bayat… [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 2:51 pm
Campbell of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in: Dale v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 5:00 am
Campbell did not state that the companies were not negotiating; instead, his comment affirmed that AmEx would not comment on negotiations while they were underway. [read post]
1 May 2020, 6:22 am
Campbell, Respondents (Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award, United States District Court for the Southern District of New York)Brokerage Firm Sues Compliance Services Provider Over FINRA Sanctions.Triton Pacific Securities, LLC, Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 1:50 am
The Eleventh Circuit quickly disposed of Campbell’s argument that the award was not taxable because, as “assignee of the United States’ claim against Lockheed, he stands in the shoes of the government in receipt of a nontaxable recovery. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 9:48 am
Still, when the Court of Appeals issued Campbell v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 12:53 pm
State v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 6:33 pm
Campbell, invalidity theoriesof defendant Campbell were rejected, but enhanced damageanalysis by CD Cal was rejected.Campbell Company (“Campbell”) appeals from the finaljudgment of the United States District Court for theCentral District of California entering judgment in favorof Polara Engineering Inc. [read post]
31 Jul 2021, 5:00 am
Supreme Court suggests that the ratio of punitive damages to compensatory damages generally should not exceed 9:1 (State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Company v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 8:38 am
Clayton County, Georgia, Respondent (United States Supreme Court)FINRA Fines/Suspends Rep Over Mismarked "Solicitation. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 1:11 pm
SCOTUS on Wednesday decided Campbell-Ewald v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 7:20 am
It was central to the Court’s holding in its previous transformative use decision, Campbell v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 11:15 am
As reported on the Hunton Employment Labor and Law Blog, on January 20, 2016, the United States Supreme Court issued its ruling in Campbell-Ewald v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 11:22 am
Campbell, 538 U.S. 408 (2003) and Exxon Shipping v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 4:16 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) K v L [2011] EWCA Civ 550 (13 May 2011) AXA Sunlife Services Plc v Campbell Martin Ltd & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 549 (12 May 2011) BDW Trading Ltd (t/a Barratt North London) v JM Rowe (Investments) Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 548 (12 May 2011) AP (Trinidad & Tobago) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 551 (12 May 2011) Kennedy v The Information Commissioner & Anor [2011] EWCA… [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 12:02 pm
., Campbell County, WY v. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 6:59 pm
In the 1797 case Campbell v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 7:40 am
The style of the case is, Morrison V. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 9:21 am
Campbell, 538 U.S. 408, 424-25 (2003); see, e.g., International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 150 v. [read post]
