Search for: "Campbell v. State" Results 201 - 220 of 2,233
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2024, 12:25 pm by Lynn L. Bergeson
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published notice of a proposed settlement agreement to address a petition for writ of mandamus filed by the Ecology Center, the Center for Environmental Health, United Parents Against Lead & Other Environmental Hazards, and the Sierra Club in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (Ecology Center v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 12:25 pm by Lynn L. Bergeson
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published notice of a proposed settlement agreement to address a petition for writ of mandamus filed by the Ecology Center, the Center for Environmental Health, United Parents Against Lead & Other Environmental Hazards, and the Sierra Club in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (Ecology Center v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 11:15 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
As reported on the Hunton Employment Labor and Law Blog, on January 20, 2016, the United States Supreme Court issued its ruling in Campbell-Ewald v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 4:16 am by tracey
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) K v L [2011] EWCA Civ 550 (13 May 2011) AXA Sunlife Services Plc v Campbell Martin Ltd & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 549 (12 May 2011) BDW Trading Ltd (t/a Barratt North London) v JM Rowe (Investments) Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 548 (12 May 2011) AP (Trinidad & Tobago) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 551 (12 May 2011) Kennedy v The Information Commissioner & Anor [2011] EWCA… [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 9:21 am
Campbell, 538 U.S. 408, 424-25 (2003); see, e.g., International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 150 v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 6:48 am by MBettman
On July 8, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
  On 27 April 2015, the CPS announced the charges on its website and its blog, stating, inter alia, that the CPS had concluded there was sufficient evidence and it was in the public interest to prosecute. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
In Foskett, Peters and Waschckuhn v Ezeugo [2018] EWHC 3694 (QB), three Judges applied for the committal to prison of a man who had repeatedly breached a harassment injunction made in their favour. [read post]