Search for: "Campbell v. State" Results 221 - 240 of 2,226
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2011, 5:00 am by Bexis
  That occurred in State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 12:48 pm by ernst
The exhibit focuses on the 8 Supreme Court cases from the state of Alabama: Powell v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 5:36 pm by Brian Shiffrin
In People v Campbell (2011 NY Slip Op 00813 [4th Dept 2/11/11]) the Court held that it was error to summarily deny a motion pursuant to CPL 440.10, based on the contention that the defendant was denied effective assistance of counsel because his trial attorney had failed to inform him of potentially exculpatory evidence, i.e., that before the murder an inmate at a state prison had advised the District Attorney that he had information concerning a plot to murder the… [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 3:54 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Find all of the latest updates at narf.org/nill/bulletins/index.html State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2019.htmlCayuga Nation v. [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 3:20 pm by Brian A. Comer
Estate of Campbell, 381 S.C. 205, 206, 672 S.E.2d 784, 784 (2009), and Griggs v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 8:41 am by WSLL
Affirmed.Case Name: LUKE EDWARD MICKELSON v. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
A recent decision by Nicol J in ERY v Associated Newspapers Ltd ([2016] EWHC 2760 (QB)) has found that a suspect in a police investigation has a reasonable expectation of privacy which is likely to trump the press’s right to freedom of expression. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 1:57 pm
State Citation: 2008 WY 118 Docket Number: S-08-0010 Appeal from the District Court of Campbell County, the Honorable Michael N. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 2:27 am
JP Morgan Securities' Regional Director's Affidavit Fails to Carry Day in TRO for Impermissible Solicitation (BrokeAndBroker.com Blog)BREAKING NEWS: 2Cir Reverses LIBOR Judgments for Insufficient EvidenceUnited States of America, Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. [read post]
13 Nov 2006, 7:18 pm
 Today I polished up and filed the brief in the Campbell v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 10:44 pm
Citing the reasoning in the recent Supreme Court decision, Kimbrough v United States that permitted Federal District Courts to consider the "100-1" ratio when considering whether or not to sentence below the federal sentencing guidelines in crack (or cocaine base) cases, Tilem & Campbell asked the Courts to take the ruling one step further and declare the mandatory minimums unconstitutional. [read post]