Search for: "Campbell v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 667
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2018, 6:33 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Campbell, invalidity theoriesof defendant Campbell were rejected, but enhanced damageanalysis by CD Cal was rejected.Campbell Company (“Campbell”) appeals from the finaljudgment of the United States District Court for theCentral District of California entering judgment in favorof Polara Engineering Inc. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 8:32 am
Gomez alleges that the Campbell-Ewald Company instructed or allowed a third-party vendor to send unsolicited text messages on behalf of the United States Navy, with whom Campbell-Ewald had a marketing contract. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 6:04 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
The Court of Appeals concludes that the defendant’s copying is transformative within the meaning of Campbell v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 4:23 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Now it’s possible to look at when people stopped saying “the United States are” and said “the United States is” by copying the contents of an entire library: a nonexpressive use. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 10:44 pm
Citing the reasoning in the recent Supreme Court decision, Kimbrough v United States that permitted Federal District Courts to consider the "100-1" ratio when considering whether or not to sentence below the federal sentencing guidelines in crack (or cocaine base) cases, Tilem & Campbell asked the Courts to take the ruling one step further and declare the mandatory minimums unconstitutional. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 12:36 pm by Shelby Everest
Campbell The United States Supreme Court was presented with the question of who has the burden of proof when a licensee files an action seeking a declaration of non-infringement against the patentee. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 12:36 pm by Shelby Everest
Campbell The United States Supreme Court was presented with the question of who has the burden of proof when a licensee files an action seeking a declaration of non-infringement against the patentee. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 3:55 am
To demonstrate a violation of Section 1983, a plaintiff must show that a person or entity, acting under color of state law, deprived him of the rights, privileges, or immunities guaranteed by the Constitution or laws of the United States;2. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 1:57 pm
State Citation: 2008 WY 118 Docket Number: S-08-0010 Appeal from the District Court of Campbell County, the Honorable Michael N. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 7:18 am by Steven Cohen
United States District Court – Western District of North Carolina – December 11th, 2015 – This is a negligence and loss of consortium case involving falling ice. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 11:36 am by Liz Hayes
The annual event is free to the public and seeks to showcase the current state of LGBTQ rights in the United States. [read post]