Search for: "Campbell v. Wainwright*" Results 1 - 13 of 13
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2015, 8:27 am by Andres
And it is a decade now since the seminal decision of the House of Lords in Campbell v MGN [2004] 2 AC 457. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
Privacy spotlighted This issue was not long untouched by the courts- in Mosley v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2008] EMLR 20 the judge Eady J. provided useful guidance to assist in the application of Campbell’s second limb. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 3:39 am
"   Here's their rundown: Docket: 08-399 (capital case)Title: Campbell v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 4:50 pm by Shahram Miri
Or the litigant could live in Campbell, a city located in the same county as the superior court, i.e. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 2:05 pm by royblack
Supreme Court decided Gideon v. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 12:19 am by INFORRM
In reaching this conclusion, the Senior Master referred to: Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] UKHL 22 at [132]; McKennitt v Ash [2008] QB 73 per Buxton LJ at [8]; Wainwright v The Home Office [2004] 2 AC 406 at [18]-[19] and [23], [43] and [62]  Perhaps unsurprisingly, the notion of a tort of physical intrusion privacy were given short shrift. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
” The milestone case of Campbell and the misuse of private information Perhaps the most significant case in this field is Campbell v MGN [2004] 2 AC 457, the groundwork for which had been set in the Douglas case. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 4:06 pm
Opinion below (District Court for the District of Columbia) Statement as to jurisdiction Motion to dismiss or affirm Reply of appellant Brief amicus curiae of American Civil Rights Union (in support of petitioner) __________________ Docket: 08-399 (capital case) Title: Campbell v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
 For example, in Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] UKHL 22, Lord Nicholls held that the wrongful disclosure of private information is just ‘one aspect of invasion of privacy’. [read post]
10 May 2010, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
However, the House of Lords has made it clear that there is no tort of invasion of privacy ( see Wainwright v Home Office [2004] 2 AC 406, Campbell v MGN [2004] 2AC 457, and the Court of Appeal in McKennitt v Ash) . [read post]