Search for: "Campos v. State" Results 121 - 140 of 253
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2018, 3:02 am
Last week IPKat was also delighted to host a guest post from Professor Lionel Bently (University of Cambridge) on the state of the debate around the proposed EU press publishers’ right: Sleepwalking towards a perpetual (news?) [read post]
20 May 2018, 2:13 pm
Book review: You Don’t Own Me: How Mattel v MGA Entertainment Exposed Barbie’s Dark SideThis book, written by Orly Lobel, describes the behind the scenes action of the dispute between Mattel and MGA Entertainment, i.e., Barbie v Bratz. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 6:50 pm
The Court concluded there were extensive human rights violations and ordered the State to provide specialized medical assistance to the victims, pay compensation for both material losses and pain and suffering, and publicly acknowledge its wrongdoing. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 12:03 am
Aragón Cardiel, Causas y azares: el renacimiento de la Corte Permanente de Arbitraje en América Latina en el campo de las inversiones extranjeras – Cause and coincidence: the renaissance of the Permanent Court of Arbitration in Latin America in the field of foreign investment A. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 7:33 am
AFSCME and several state pension funds, including the nation's largest, the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS), sent letters to the SEC in mid-November urging Cox to let the AFSCME v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 8:35 am
I BREAKING: Unanimous Supreme Court in Samsung v Apple finds that damages may be based on a component, not whole product I Will Iceland's EU trade mark end up on ice? [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 4:53 pm by John Elwood
United States, 10-9445, Guerrero-Campos v. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 7:41 am by Daniel Shaviro
I accept the political science case for having a Constitution and court system, with the courts having a mandate, a la Marbury v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 8:46 am by Nabiha Syed
Briefly: At PrawfsBlawg, Sergio Campos continues his commentary on Wal-Mart v. [read post]