Search for: "Campos v. State" Results 161 - 180 of 255
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2012, 5:30 am by Don Cruse
LUZELMA CAMPOS, BETTY JO GONZALEZ, AND MISTY VALERO, No. 11-0728 Per Curiam This case under the Texas Tort Claims Act involves the intersection between two quirks of the Texas statute — that that statute bars claims for intentional torts against the State and that any negligence claims for personal injury against the State generally must flow from the use of “tangible personal property. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 5:20 am
  If Campos and Nazarath carry the day, the likelihood that a future Commission will tamper with the result is is substantially less. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 6:20 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 6:40 am by John Elwood
 Certiorari stage documents: Opinion below (5th Cir. ) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Guerrero-Campos v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:33 pm by John Elwood
(relisted after the June 22 conference) Campos-Chaves v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:38 am by James Bickford
  At PrawfsBlawg, Sergio Campos discusses the Court’s opinion in Wal-Mart v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 12:51 pm by rstokes
The following are just a few examples from cases in the state of New York: Tobin v. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 8:20 pm by Zack Bluestone
The main case she cited was United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:18 pm by Kiera Flynn
Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition   Guerrero-Campos v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm by John Elwood
United States, 10-9445 (three relists); Guerrero-Campos v. [read post]
10 Jan 2009, 1:17 pm
" The two dissenting judges (Erdmann & Ryan, JJ.) argued that the majority's approach was precluded by United States v. [read post]