Search for: "Capital Holding Corp. v. District of Columbia"
Results 1 - 20
of 89
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2009, 5:54 pm
District of Columbia, No. 09-7035, an appeal challenging an attempt to take property by the District of Columbia and the National Capital Revitalization Corporation. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 2:13 pm
National Capital Revitalization Corp., 7 A.3d 997 (D.C. 2010)). [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 9:29 pm
National Capital Revitalization Corp., No. 06-CV-645 (July 12, 2007), a decision from the District of Columbia Court of Appeals about the level of proof needed to show a "pretextual" -- and therefore prohibited -- taking. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 11:56 am
Eli Lilly and CompanyCase number: 12-cv-2045 (United States District Court for the District of Columbia)Case filed: December 20, 2012Qualifying judgment/order: January 2, 2013 02/08/2013 05/09/2013 2013-13 SEC v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 7:58 pm
" Fresh Int'l Corp. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:15 am
Small Business Capital Corp., Mark Feathers; Investors Prime Fund, LLC; and SBC Portfolio Fund, LLC.Case number: 12-cv-3237 (United States District Court for the Northern District of California)Case filed: June 21, 2012Qualifying judgment/order: November 6, 2013 11/21/2013 02/19/2014 2013-105 SEC v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 8:46 am
(Unocal Corp. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 9:01 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and then Chief Justice William Rehnquist on the Supreme Court. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 12:24 am
At least two other courts -- the District of Columbia and Hawaii -- have viewed the Fifth Amendment and Kelo similarly, holding that the Public Use Clause reserves the question of whether a particular use or purpose is in fact the reason for a taking for judicial review. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 2:04 pm
Alamo Water Supply Corp. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 11:43 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has held and the United States has repeatedly urged, contrary to the decision below. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 9:01 pm
" JMM Corp. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 10:57 am
— CyberSource Corp. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am
Madden v. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am
Madden v. [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 7:17 am
The leading case is Bridgeway Corp. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 8:52 am
"We, therefore, hold that the district court abused its considerable discretion in barring Riverkeeper's suit. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 1:08 pm
Sustainable Energy Corp. and John H. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 2:29 pm
Mount Lemmon Fire District v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 8:55 am
Ohio v. [read post]
