Search for: "Carey v. State" Results 121 - 140 of 467
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2020, 8:40 am by Randy E. Barnett
(2015) Michael Paulsen & Luke Paulsen, The Constitution: An Introduction (2015) Thomas Leonard, Illiberal Reformers: Race, Eugenics, and American Economics in the Progressive Era (2016) Tara Smith, Judicial Review in an Objective Legal System (2015) Ilya Somin, The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 8:03 am by Schachtman
 In this plantworker case, I represented Carey-Canada in what turned out to be one of its last cases in the United States, before filing for bankruptcy. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 9:00 pm by Katharine Van Tassel
Hodge (Arizona State University), Sarah Wetter (University of Maryland), Emily Carey (Arizona State University), Elyse Pendergrass (Arizona State University), Claudia M. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 1:45 pm
United States, 362 U.S. 257, 80 S.Ct. 725, 4 L.Ed.2d 697 (1960) (friend's apartment); United States v. [read post]
29 May 2020, 12:32 pm by Adam Feldman
United States, placing him only one word behind Adam Unikowsky, who spoke 4,185 words in Sveen v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:23 pm by Amy Howe
A majority of the justices appeared skeptical of claims, made by a lawyer for the House of Representatives, that the committees have broad power to request the president’s personal papers, but they seemed equally dubious in the second argument that the president has the categorical immunity from state grand-jury proceedings that he is claiming. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 4:00 am by Jessica Clogg
Canada (Attorney General) and Coastal GasLink Pipeline Ltd v Huson. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 11:56 am by Leah Litman and Steve Vladeck
Boren allowed a bartender to challenge a law that prohibited serving “near beer” to women under 18 and men under 21 (even though the vendor, who was subject to the law, was asserting customers’ rights to be free from sex discrimination); Carey v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 4:30 am by Ray Dowd
Carey, 376 F.3d 841, 847–48 (9th Cir.2004) (relying on expert testimony comparing the objective elements—pitch, melodies, baselines, tempo, chords, structure, and harmonic rhythm—of musical works); Chiate v. [read post]