Search for: "Carney v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 325
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2019, 7:08 am
The seminal case in this area is Glatt v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 10:29 am
The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held oral argument yesterday in Jones v. [read post]
Ninth Circuit Discusses Withdrawal Under Rule 36(b); Determines Lower Court Did Not Abuse Discretion
5 Apr 2007, 2:44 am
United States, 45 F.3d 1345, 1348 (9th Cir.1995); see also Carney v. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
Exhibit A: The decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in Chevron v. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 6:44 am
The Court of Appeals says Yes.The case is Briggs v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 4:25 am
United States, which struck down part of a statute that “imposes sentencing enhancements on repeat offenders who commit crimes with guns. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 7:19 am
” Smith v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 6:32 am
App. 2014); In re Adoption of T.R.M., 525 N.E.2d 298, 308 (Ind. 1988); In re T.S., 801 P.2d 77, 79-80 (Mont. 1990); Carney v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 8:41 am
” Petrosino v. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 6:32 am
The Court of Appeals has upheld the verdict.The case is Southerland v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 7:52 am
This case fails as well.The case is Balentine v. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 10:32 am
In United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:05 am
Breyer delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court, Justice Barrett not participating, in Carney v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 3:58 am
[EPIC v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 6:51 am
" It seems to say that someone from New York cannot sue Pennsylvania in federal court, but that's not how the courts have interpreted it.The case is Leitner v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 12:21 am
Carney Order [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 6:24 am
Which is how this case reached the Court of Appeals.The case is Pierre v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 2:31 pm
Sit downToday, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal heard oral argument in the case of Jones v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 4:51 am
The Circuit notes that Jackler v. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 7:16 am
But we are bound by our Court’s decision in Sutherland v. [read post]
