Search for: "Carr v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 661
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2010, 11:09 am by Corey Rayburn Yung
For essentially the reasons explained by the Court of Appeals, see United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 8:35 am by Daily Record Staff
Appealing from the denial by the Circuit Court for Baltimore City of a Motion to Correct Illegal Sentence and Motion to Disclose Grand Jury Testimony Records, appellant, William Carr, presents three questions, which we consolidate and rephrase, for our review: 1. [read post]
12 Dec 2009, 3:38 pm by Corey Rayburn Yung
Together, Doug Berman, Wayne Logan, and I authored an amicus brief on behalf of law professors in the case of Carr v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:09 am by Corey Rayburn Yung
For essentially the reasons explained by the Court of Appeals, see United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 2:05 am
. ---: Brief for Petitioner Thomas Carr ---: Brief for National Association for Criminal Defense Lawyers in Support of Petitioner ---: Brief for Law Professors in Support of Petitioner Earlier case which will be tested: CALDER v. [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 7:31 am
  Carr J stated in respect of this argument he would have concluded that the "shear variant" produced substantially the same result in the same way and obviously so as the patent states it is the preferred arrangement. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 1:18 pm
 Following Coflexip SA v Stolt Comex Seaway MS Ltd [2001] 1 All ER 952, Carr J held that the Court has discretion to impose an injunction where it is necessary and appropriate in the circumstances. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 12:56 pm by Erin Miller
Transcripts of oral arguments are here for Carr v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 12:21 pm
7-1-2010 7th Circuit:From Sentencing, Law & Policy:A number of helpful readers have alerted me to a notable split Seventh Circuit opinion today in United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 11:47 am by Kirk Jenkins
Our preview of the September term of the Illinois Supreme Court continues with Carr v. [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 7:30 am
”Henry loved when he was in "shear mode"Claim "Interpretation"  - it is all about what you say and disclaimWith the old "Construction" heading now replaced with "Interpretation", Mr Justice Carr stated he would be applying"principles concerning normal interpretation and equivalents set out by the Supreme Court in Actavis v Eli Lilly [2017] UKSC 48, [2018] and by the Patents Court in Mylan v Yeda [2017] EWHC… [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 5:29 am
  It was only too bad that the event was not held after the latest decision of Mr Justice Carr in the TQ Delta v Zyxel saga was published. [read post]